Discarded Pearl's headrests

It seems rather aesthetically pleasing. However, be vigilant in the rear-view mirror while stationary, in case a KIA driver is engaged in texting.
 
Headrests are designed not for relaxation, but for the avoidance of whiplash. My mother spent that much for a 1970 Chevelle.
 
I bet your neck will seem remarkable upon impact.

I intend to remove my seat belts this weekend.
 
Unexpectedly appealing appearance. Those of us cautioning about the danger do not seem to have the same apprehension with those operating the 1971 and earlier SL, or pre-1967 Corvette or Mustang.
 
Those vehicles were never equipped with them, hence they cannot be removed; it is a comparison of unlike entities. I own a 1965 Mustang in which I deliberately added lap belts.
 
Some individuals use motorbikes without helmets; some have lived, while others have perished. Each everyone has their own preferences. I favor headrests and seatbelts, but I am uncertain about the airbag in front of me, since they were not very advanced in the past.
 
Pearl seems aesthetically pleasing sans headrests. I navigated driving from the early 1960s through the 1980s mostly without seat belts, headrests, or airbags. If you appreciate it, pursue it.
 
I am curious about the impact on wind noise. Furthermore, does the presence of a wind deflector influence performance in the absence of headrests?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom